What are we to make of the White House Race rigging allegations?
November 26th, 2004
-
Is former Labour minister, Michael Meacher on to something?
At the risk of appearing a bad loser, a conspiracy theorist or a paranoid we publish extracts from an article by former Labour cabinet minister, Michael Meacher, in this week’s New Statesman.
He raises questions that do seem worthy of further investigation about the exit polls on November 2nd in states where there was electronic voting (above) and the rest. Meacher’s claim is that the polls were reasonably accurate in the latter but in states where electronic systems were in place they were not - and the “errors” were all in the President’s favour.
Unfortunately the article does not contain enough detailed statistical analysis to make the case fully but we thought that Politicalbetting users might find it interesting.
Meacher writes:-Now allegations are surfacing that the use of electronic voting systems and optical scanning devices may have had a significant influence on the result. Computer security experts insist that such sys- tems are not secure and not tamper-proof, yet they were used to count a third of the votes across 37 states. Though the Democrats remain strangely coy about the whole subject, academics and political analysts are now drawing comparisons between areas that used paper ballots and areas that used electronic systems. Is it possible that results in the latter were rigged?
An analysis of the poll by different states points up inconsistencies that cannot be explained by random variation. In Arizona, Colorado, Louisiana, Michigan, Iowa, New Mexico, Maine, Nevada, Arkansas and Missouri, where a variety of different voting systems were used, including paper ballots in many cases, the four companies carrying out exit polls were almost exactly right and their results were certainly within the margin of error. In Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Florida, Minnesota, New Hampshire and North Carolina, however, where electronic or optical scanning machines were used (though not exclusively), the tracking polls were seriously discrepant from the published result.
Two aspects of this are immediately striking. One is the large size of the variance, and the other is that in every case it favoured Bush. In Wisconsin and Ohio, the discrepancy favoured Bush by 4 per cent, in Pennsylvania by 5 per cent, in Florida and Minnesota by 7 per cent, in North Carolina by 9 per cent and in New Hampshire by an astonishing 15 per cent.
Moreover, extensive voting irregularities have been reported across the US - including intimidation, exclusion of black voters from electoral rolls, touchscreens that consistently registered support for Bush when the name Kerry was touched, and a large number of county precincts (including in Ohio) where the number of votes cast exceeded the total number of registered voters, sometimes by large margins. In Florida, for example, the number of votes reported for all the candidates exceeded the maximum possible voter turnout by 237,522, so that a minimum of 3.1 per cent of the votes must be fraudulent, and possibly considerably more…
…So can we really be sure that this year’s result was an accurate reflection of the popular will? It has emerged that the Diebold Gems software and optical scan voting machines used in counting a high proportion of the votes may not be tamper-proof from hacking, particularly via remote modems. Two US computer security experts, in their recently published book Black Box Voting, argue that “by entering a two-digit code in a hidden location, a second set of votes is created; and this set of votes can be changed in a matter of seconds, so that it no longer matches the correct votes”. After the Florida fiasco four years earlier, the US Congress voted $3.9bn to improve the quality of voting systems. Perhaps the latest revelations about what happened where electronic systems were used may become known as the “November surprise”.
It will be interesting to see if this is taken up. It does need the detailed numbers to support the case.
MessageSpace Advertising
The only thing that surprises me is that it has taken so long for this sort of allegation to surface. Left-wing American blogs were banging on about how the machines were going to steal the election for Bush for months before November 2.
Presumably if the Democrats had thought there was anything to it, they would have challenged the paper trail-less systems in court.
I do get the impression that US elections are run in a very haphazard way compared to UK ones.
Anthony Wells has a detailed analysis of this over at his site (for the uninitiated, it\’s at http://anthonywells.typepad.com/anthony_wells/ ).
I\’m slightly wary of taking anything Meacher says at face value since he (apparently) lent his support to the 9/11 conspiracy theories.
As I said twice in the main article the Meacher New Statesman feature lacks the detailed numbers to make the case. I\’m convinved by the Anthony Wells analysis.
Stories like these do not help the left one iota, after the last election they spent 4 years moaning about how \”Bush stole the election\” when they should of been forming strong policies and picking a better candiate. if this same attitude prevails for the next 4 years i would have no doubts that the republicans would be returned to the White House in 2008.
One comment on the figures: if the election was fixed why would they go to the effort of giving bush a 15% swing over the exit polls in New Hampshire (a relatively small 4 electoral votes it might be noted) yet not give him the state? If you\’re going to carry out a blantant fraud you mays as well go the whole way;)
I suspect these exit polls were carried out in large cities (traditional Democrat strongholds) which would of been easier to conduct and consequently skewed the sample towards Kerry.
The British General Election in 1992 showed systematic pro-Labour errors in the exit polls. I think Americans have hitherto put more trust in exit polls than is justified.
Mike - question to be asked is why have you given Meacher who appears to be an extremely poor loser credance by publicing his apparrent falsehoods.You state\”it does need the detailed numbers to support the case\” - so why publicise it.
If I or a newspaper stated \”Kennedy is a drunkard and liar\” I\’m sure you would be demanding evidence.I realise you did not like the result of the American Presidential election but you cannot change the result by casting slurs or repeating them.
On reflection Vino - I think I made a mistake by publishing the Meacher piece because it did give it credence. I was over-impressed by the fact that it was in the New Statesman - a magazine that I buy and usually have a high regard for.
A reason the Democrats might be coy about the discrepancies is that those could have originated on either side of the equation; the vote totals were wrong, or the exit polls were wrong. It\’s a lot easier to corrupt a few miniscule exit polls, perhaps with discreet leaks about locations, than to alter the results in thousands of machines in 37 states. Perhaps the Democrats don\’t want the exit polls investigated.
Manuel cushioned undertakings:Erickson enterprising tending breezes Neff
1-26-06
I was searching the web and found your entry. I really like your site and found it worth while reading through the posts. I am looking to publish a comprehensive site reviewing many different articles and blog. Please feel free to take a look at my blog at computer training course
and add anything your want.
Hello, I thought I’d just leave this message on your blog. I hope you don’t mind. I’ve been trying to find blogs where people are talking about anti phishing software and when I was looking, I found this one on this post. You have helped me in some way. Anyway, I want to say thank you before I go off to find some more info about it.
Great blog. Found your blog while searching for more information at yahoo about electronic grade book . Your blog has quite a lot of interesting thoughts. Keep up the good work.
tnsdiqnw…
tzbacexj nstnxczgto xoaqyydgt…
Celebrex….
Celebrex side effects. Class action lawsuit for celebrex. Celebrex side effects interactions. Celebrex. Celebrex lawyers houston….
Paxil side effects….
Paxil side effects. Safest way to get off paxil. How does paxil raise blood sugar. Paxil….
Celexa….
Celexa dosage. Taking elavil with celexa. Celexa….
Doxycicline….
Doxycicline….
Handheld gps reviews….
Best handheld mapping gps. Handheld gps review….
[…] pdelray wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptHandheld gps reviews…. Best handheld mapping gps. Handheld gps review…. […]
Grand victoria casino….
Grand casino tunica. Grand casino. Mgm grand casino. Grand casino tunica mississippi. Grand casino biloxi….
Spirit mountain casino….
Mohegan sun casino. Casino royale….
Garmin nuvi 660 gps….
Garmin gps antenna 188c. Garmin gps….
Casino royale….
Latest no deposit bonus casino coupon codes. Oneida casino. Atlantic city casino. Play casino games. Casino royale. Tropicana casino….